ParetoRank the pain.
When everything seems important, count the recurring problems and rank them by impact. Pareto Analysis helps you focus on the few categories creating most of the trouble.
The café logged 100 incidents this week. ☕🍉🥄
Capybara cannot fix all six categories at once. So instead of arguing about what feels worst, we turn the incident log into ranked evidence.
RANKED INCIDENTS + CUMULATIVE IMPACT_
Three categories create four-fifths of the incidents.
The 80/20 rule is a useful heuristic, not a law. Here the data happens to land exactly at 80% after the first three categories.
Start where the bars are tallest.
Capybara fixes the watermelon handling process first, then coffee temperature, then spoon replenishment. The squeaky chair can remain dramatically squeaky for another day.
REAL WORLD TRANSLATION_
REMEMBER_
Pareto prioritizes; it does not explain causality. A tall bar tells you where the impact is concentrated, not why that category occurs. After choosing a priority, use a causal technique such as 5 Whys or Fishbone to investigate it.
TRY IT YOURSELF_
Enter recurring categories and their counts or impact values. The workspace ranks them automatically, calculates cumulative contribution, and shows where your focus threshold is reached.
saved on this device
CAPYBARA PRIVACY NOTE_ Keep passwords, API keys, access tokens and credentials out of the workspace. Private Session controls problem.me storage; it is not a secret vault. HOW PRIVACY WORKS →
PRIVACY: this draft stays in your browser's local storage. Nothing is uploaded.
EVIDENCE LEDGER_
Separate what you know from what you think. Facts, assumptions, tests and results stay visible while the investigation evolves.